Kontribusi Teori Sanksi dan Asas Pembuktian terhadap Jarîmah Korupsi di Indonesia

  • Nasrullah Nasrullah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Malikussaleh Aceh
Keywords: Corruption, reversed proof, Islamic theories of jaw?bir and zaw?jir.

Abstract

Islamic law consists of a set of norms, principles and rules of law enforcement, dealing with the eradication of corruption. In the history of Islamic law, there have been the theories and principles of Islamic law, such as the theory of jawâbir, zawâjir, and the principle of min ayn lak hâdhâ (known as the reversed evidence) regarding the application of criminal sanctions of corruption. The application of criminal sanctions of corruption in Indonesia, especially with regard to the principle of reversed evidence has not been well-formulated. For the perfection of legislation in combating corruption, it is possible for the Indonesian government to amend the existing legislation, in order to make the country free from corruption. This paper focuses on the study of theoretical contributions on sanctions and the principle of proof evidence in Islamic criminal law to be transformed into criminal sanctions of corruption in Indonesia, which refers to the theory of jawâbir, zawâjir, and the principle of min ayn lak hâdhâ, which had been done previously by the caliph ?Umar b. al-Khatt?b and succeeded in preventing and combating corruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

?A?la, Rofiqul. ?Suap dalam Pespektif Islam? dalam A.S. Burhan dkk, ed., Korupsi di Negeri kaum Beragama: Ikhtiar Membangun Fiqh Anti Korupsi. Jakarta: P3M dan Kemitraan-Partnership, 2004.

?Am?r (al), ?Abd al-?Az?z. al-Ta?z?r f? al-Shar??ah al-Isl?m?yah. Kairo: D?r al-Fikr al-?Arab?, 1976.

Amiruddin, Hasbi. Republik Umar bin Khattab. Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2010.

Atmasasmita, Romli. ?Pembuktian Terbalik Kasus Korupsi?, Harian Seputar Indonesia, 27 September 2006.

Azra, Azyumardi. ?Umar bin Khattab: Konsep dan Praksis Ketatanegaraan?, dalam Hasbi Amiruddin, Republik Umar bin Khattab. Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2010.

Baltaji, Muhammad. Metodologi Ijtihad Umar bin al-Khathab, terj. Masturi Irham. Jakarta: KHALIFA, 2005.

Bassar, M. Sudradjat. Hukum Pidana: Pelengkap KUHP. Bandung: Armico, 1983.

Basyir, Ahmad Azhar. Ikhtisar Fikih Jinayat: Hukum Pidana Islam. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2001.

Bukh?r? (al), Ab? ?Abd All?h Muhammad b. Ism???l b. Ibr?h?m b. Mugh?rah. Sah?h al-Bukh?r?, Vol. 1. t.t.: D?r al-Fikr, t.th.

Din, Muhammad. Stimulasi Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Nasional dari Aceh untuk Indonesia. Bandung: UNPAD PRESS 2009.

Fajardin, Mohammad Atik. ?Efek Jera Bagi Koruptor dengan Siapkan Peti Mati?, Sindonews, 24 Juli 2013.

Had?d (al), Ibn Ab?. Sharh Nahj al-Bal?ghah, Vol. 1. Kairo: D?r Ihy?? al-Kit?b al-?Arab?yah, 1959.

Hajj?j (al), ?Abd al-Husayn Muslim b. Sah?h Muslim, Vol. 5. Damaskus: D?r al-Fikr, t.th.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sapta Artha Jaya, 1996.

Irfan, M. Nurul. Korupsi dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Amzah, 2011.

Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1989.

Lawyer Committee for Human Right, Fair Trial: Prinsip-prinsip Peradilan yang Adil dan Tidak Memihak, terj. Ahmad Fauzan. Jakarta: Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia, 1997.

Lubis, T. Mulia. Pembuktian Terbalik Tidak Mudah, http://www.hukum online.com/diakses pada 5 April 2001.

Murs?, Muhammad Sa??d. Tokoh-tokoh Besar Islam Sepanjang Sejarah, terj. Khoirul Amru Harahap dan Achmad Faozan. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2007.

Musharrafah, ?At?yah Mustaf?. al-Qad? f? al-Isl?m. T.tp: Shirkah al-Sharq al-Aws?t, 1966.

Nasrullah. ?Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Hukum Islam dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan Republik Indonesia: Studi Kritis Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi?, Disertasi. Banda Aceh--Program Pascasarjana IAIN Ar-Raniry, 2013.

Pangaribuan, Luhut MP. ?Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik?, Kompas, 2 April 2001, 1.

Poernomo, Bambang. Pertumbuhan Hukum Penyimpangan di Luar Kodifikasi Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1986.

Praja, Juhaya S. Teori-teori Hukum: Suatu Telaah Perbandingan dengan Pendekatan Filsafat. Bandung: Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri, 2009.

Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman. Sistem Pembuktian dan Alat Bukti. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1983.

Santoso, Topo. ?Pembuktian Terbalik Hanya Pengalihan Isu?, Jakarta Post, 5 April 2001, 1.

Sh?tib? (al), Ab? Ish?q. al-Muw?faq?t f? Us?l al-Shar??ah, Vol. 2. Beir?t: D?r al-Kut?b al-?Ilm?yah, t.th.

Sudarsono. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Renika Cipta, Cet. Ke-5, 2007.

Suy?t? (al), Jal?l al-D?n. T?r?kh al-Khulaf??. Kairo: D?r al-Kut?b al-Salaf?yah, t.th.

Taqwaddin. Esensi Hukum Rajam. Lhokseumawe: Serambi, 2009.

Zarq? (al), Mustaf? Ahmad. al-Madkhal al-Fiqh? al-??m, Vol. 2. Damaskus: D?r al-Fikr, Cet. Ke-2, 1968.

Published
2015-09-07
How to Cite
Nasrullah, Nasrullah. “Kontribusi Teori Sanksi Dan Asas Pembuktian Terhadap Jarîmah Korupsi Di Indonesia”. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 9, no. 2 (September 7, 2015): 479-502. Accessed December 18, 2018. http://islamica.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/islamica/article/view/239.
Section
Articles