The Integration-Interconnection of Sciences in Early Islamic Historiography: A Study on Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk by al-Ṭabarī 

Main Article Content

Nurul Hak
Kholili Badriza

Abstract

This article examines the integration-intercon-nection of sciences in Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk. It argues that the integration-interconnection has been an integral part of early Islamic historiographical works. Hence there were no historical problems related to the integration-interconnection in the treasures of Islamic sciences. This research employs the integration-inter-connection and the functional theory as a conceptual framework. This research also uses the historical method, comprising heuristic, data verification, interpretation, and historiography. To further examine the issues, it also employs the intertextual approach. The results of this study showed that the integration interconnection in Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī is correlated to scientific and metho-dological aspects. The scientific element referred to here is the coherence and interrelation among the subjects of history, literature, ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān, and ‘Ulūm al-Ḥa-dīth in Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī. At the same time, the methodolo-gical aspect referred to the meaning, function and implication of the integration-interconnection, either in the study of Islamic history or Islam in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hak, Nurul, and Kholili Badriza. “The Integration-Interconnection of Sciences in Early Islamic Historiography: A Study on Tārīkh Al-Rusul Wa Al-Mulūk by Al-Ṭabarī ”. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 16, no. 2 (March 1, 2022): 246-273. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://islamica.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/islamica/article/view/899.
Section
Articles

References

Abdullah, Amin et. al. Rekonstruksi Metodologi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman. Yogyakarta: Suka press, 2003.
Abdullah, M. Amin. “Religion, Science, and Culture: An Integrated, Interconnected Paradigm of Science,” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 52, No. 1, June 8, 2014.
Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993.
Baghdādī (al), Al-Khaṭīb. Tārīkh Madīnat al-Salām wa Akhbār Muḥaddithīhā wa Dhikr Quṭṭānih al-‘Ulamā’ Min Ghayr Ahlih wa Wāridih, Vol. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 2001.
Barbour, Ian G. When Science Meets Religion. New York: Harper Collins, 2000, https://www.harpercollins.com/products/when-science-meets-religion-ian-g-barbour; accessed on Janu-ary 24, 2022.
Bayumi, Muhammad Rahman and Rizal Alfit Jaya. “Building Integration and Interconnection in Islamic Economic System to Create Islamic Solutions in Solving Social Problems,” Share: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, Vol. 7, No. 1, June 30, 2018.
Beeston, A. F. L. and Lawrence I. Conrad. “On Some Umayyad Poetry in the History of al-Ṭabarī,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 3, No. 2 (1993), 191.
Dhahabī (al), Muḥammad b. Aḥmad b. ‘Uthmān Siyār A‘lām al-Nubalā’, Vol. 14. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1983.
Enan, M. A. Ibn Khaldun: His Life and Work, Sixth Edition. Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, 1975.
Fidā’ (al), Abū. Al-Mukhtaṣar fī Tārīkh al-Bashar, Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.
Garraghan, Gilbert J. and Jean Delanglez. A Guide to Historical Method. New York: Fordham University Press, 1957.
Ḥalībah (al), Nabīlah b. Zayn b. Sa‘d Mahnaj al-Imām b. Jarīr al-Ṭabarī fī Naqd al-Aḥādīth. Riyadh: Dār al-Ma’thūr, 2014.
Ḥamawī (al), Yāqūt. Mu‘jam al-Udabā’: Irshād al-Arīb Ilā Ma‘rifati al-Adīb, Vol. 18. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1993.
Ḥasan, ‘Alī Bakr. Al-Ṭabarī wa Manhajuh fī al-Tārīkh. Kairo: Dār Gharīb, 2003.
Ḥasan, Munīrah ‘Abd. “Manhaj al-Imām al-Ṭabarī fī Kitābat Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk li al-Fatrah 132-170 H./749-786 M,” Majallah al-Tarbawīyah wa al-‘Ilmīyah Kulliyyat al-Tarbīyah al-Jāmi‘ah al-‘Irāqīyah, Vol. 2, No. 10 (2017), 51-64.
Hak, Nurul. “Classical Islamic Historiography in Early Moslem and Orientalist Historiographical Works,” Sunan Kalijaga: International Journal of Islamic Civilization, Vol. 3, No. 2 (September 20, 2020), 217–218.
Ibn al-Athīr. Al-Kāmil fī al-Tārīkh, Vol. 1. N.p: n.p., n.d.
-----. Al-Kāmil fī al-Tārīkh, Vol. 8. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, n.d.
Ibn Kathīr. Al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah. Giza: Dār Ḥijr, 1997.
Ibn Khallikān. Wafayāt al-A‘yān, Vol. 4. Beirut: Dār al-Thaqāfah, 1971.
Ibn Nadīm. al-Fihrist. N.p.: n.p., 1971.
Kartanegara, Mulyadi. Integrasi Ilmu. Bandung: Arasy, 2005.
Kartodirdjo, Sartono. Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1992.
Kātibī, Ghaydā K. “Manhaj al-Ṭabarī al-Muarrikh Fī al-Kitābah ‘an al-Fatrah al-῾Abbāsiyyah al-Ūlā (132 H/749M-170H/786M),” Dirāsāt al-‘Ūlūm al-Insānīyah wa al-Ijtimā‘īyah, Vol. 36 (2009), 853-857.
Khalifah, Haji. Kashf al-Dhunūn. N.p: n.p., n.d.
Klar, Marianna. “Between ‘History’ and ‘Tafsīr’: Notes on al-Ṭabarī’s Methodological Strategies,” Journal of Qur’anic Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2 (2016), 89.
Luqman, Mohammad. “An Analysis of The Earliest Arab Historical Writers (Ibn Isḥaq, al-Ṭabarī and al-Baladhurī).” Ph.D. Dissertation--University of Glasgow, 1981, available at https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b1629304; accessed on January 25, 2022.
Mårtensson, Ulrika. “‘It’s the Economy, Stupid’: al-Ṭabarī’s Analysis of the Free Rider Problem in the ʿAbbāsid Caliphate,” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 54, No. 2 (2011), 204.
-----. “Discourse and Historical Analysis: The Case of al-Ṭabarī’s History of the Messengers and the Kings,” Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3 (September 1, 2005), 287-331.
Mas‘ūdī (al). Murūj al-Dhahab wa Madā’in al-Jawhar, Fifth Edition, Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.
Mirtoxirovna, Agzamova Muhabbat. “The Scientific Legacy of Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad b. Jarīr b. Yazid b. Kathīr b. Ghālib al-Ṭabarī and The Important of Tārīkh al-Rusul Val-Mulūk,” Journal of Critical Reviews, Vol. 7, No. 5 (2020), 923-925.
Momigliano, Arnaldo. “Tradition and the Classical Historian,” History and Theory, Vol. 11, No. 3 (1972), 279-293.
Muhaya, Abdul. “Unity of Science According to Al-Ghazali,” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, Vol. 23, No. 2, December 27, 2015.
Mulalic, Muhidin. “al-Ṭabarī: The Conception of History,” Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, Vol. 4, No. 1 (August 31, 2003), 183-202.
Najjār (al), ‘Abd al-Ḥalīm. Tārīkh al-Adāb al-῾Arabī. N.p.: Dār al-Ma῾ārif, 1961.
Nicholson, R.A. Literary History of The Arabs. New Delhi: Adam Publishers & Distributors, 2003.
Robinson, Chase F. “A Local Historian’s Debt to al-Ṭabarī: The Case of al-Azdī’s ‘Ta’rīkh al-Mawṣil,’” Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 126, No. 4 (2006), 521-535.
Rosenthal, Franz. A History of Muslim Historiography. Leiden: Brill, 1968, https://brill.com/view/title/1927; accessed on January 25, 2022.
Sibā῾ī (al), Bayūmī. Tārīkh al-Ādāb al-‘Arabī bi ghayr al-Andalūs wa al-Maghrib. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍah al-Miṣrīyah, 1948.
Ṭabarī (al), Muḥammad b. Jarīr. Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk, Second Edition, Vol. 1. Cairo: Dār al-Ma῾ārif, n.d.
-----. Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk, Second Edition, Vol. 2. Cairo: Dār al-Ma῾ārif, n.d.
-----. Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk, Second Edition, Vol. 3 (Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif, n.d.), 100-103.
-----. Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk, Second Edition, Vol. 4. Cairo: Dār al-Ma῾ārif, n.d.
-----. Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk, Second Edition, Vol. 6. Cairo: Dār al-Ma῾ārif, n.d.
-----. Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk, Second Edition, Vol. 7. Cairo: Dār al-Ma῾ārif, n.d.
Tayob, Abdelkader I. “Ṭabarī on the Companions of the Prophet: Moral and Political Contours in Islamic Historical Writing,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 119, No. 2 (1999), 203-210.